--- product_id: 246080327 title: "Star Trek (2009) [Blu-ray] [2017] [4K UHD]" price: "₩131111" currency: KRW in_stock: true reviews_count: 7 url: https://www.desertcart.kr/products/246080327-star-trek-2009-blu-ray-2017-4k-uhd store_origin: KR region: South Korea --- # Star Trek (2009) [Blu-ray] [2017] [4K UHD] **Price:** ₩131111 **Availability:** ✅ In Stock ## Quick Answers - **What is this?** Star Trek (2009) [Blu-ray] [2017] [4K UHD] - **How much does it cost?** ₩131111 with free shipping - **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship - **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.kr](https://www.desertcart.kr/products/246080327-star-trek-2009-blu-ray-2017-4k-uhd) ## Best For - Customers looking for quality international products ## Why This Product - Free international shipping included - Worldwide delivery with tracking - 15-day hassle-free returns ## Description 4 X SHARPER THAN HD The future begins in J.J. Abrams’ “high-octane hit” STAR TREK that has taken audiences by storm. When the Romulan Nero comes from the future to take revenge on the Federation, rivals Kirk and Spock must work together to stop him from destroying everything they know. On an “exhilarating” journey fi lled with “spectacular action”, comedy and cosmic peril, the new recruits of the U.S.S. Enterprise will voyage through unimaginable danger, boldly going where no one has gone before. “Even if you’ve never seen Star Trek before, this movie is for you! DISC ONE: 4K ULTRA HD MOVIE DISC TWO: BLU-RAY MOVIE + BONUS FEATURES • Commentary by J.J. Abrams, Bryan Burk, Damon Lindelof, Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci Review: A truly entertaining and thoroughly enjoyable movie! - Every time I watch this movie I am reminded how much I enjoy it. Let me say from the start that I grew up on the original series (TOS), and I am a die-hard "Star Trek" fan. However, since TOS is truly unique and unrepeatable, I don't judge the movie by those standards, as I think to do so is a losing proposition. Why not let this movie stand or fall on its own merits? Why not appreciate it for what it is rather than what some people imagine it should have been? For people familiar with TOS, there are definitely moments that are genuinely Star Trek, such as the interactions between Kirk/Spock and Kirk/McCoy. It was funny, for instance, to hear what they suggested as the origins of McCoy's nickname, Bones. McCoy also has some classic moments when, like his TOS counterpart, his emotions get the better of him. And then there is the scene where Chekov attempts to speak his password to the computer, only to be initially rejected because of his thick Russian accent ("Wictor, Wictor" instead of "Victor, Victor"). These are the kinds of moments that made TOS truly memorable, and it was wonderful to see them in the movie. I think Zachary Quinto does exceedingly well as the young Spock. I found young Kirk's character to be a little more reckless than I think is necessary, but Chris Pine did a fine job portraying him. We learned the first names of several major characters. There is plenty of action, excellent special effects, and a good story line. And, just like TOS, there are some very funny one-liners. I actually would give the movie four and a half stars if I could. Despite the high entertainment value of this movie, there were a few things that proved to be just plain silliness for me. Overall they did not ruin the movie, but they were certainly momentary distractions and warranted a minor deduction in my rating: 1. The whole Spock/Uhura romance is utterly foreign to TOS, so I don't know why it was introduced in this movie. It just seemed pointless to me. 2. The idea of the "red matter" was also problematic. TOS was consistent in making the science of its day very believable. Even though the show was science fiction, many of the concepts contained therein were based on real science. How is it, then, that while one drop of the red matter can create a small black hole, it can be touched with a syringe and stored in a container? 3. Arguably the most absurd aspect of the technology in the movie was the decision to use a brewery for the engineering shots. My goodness, it's the 23rd century. Take a look at the Enterprise's bridge. It's brimming with ultra hi-tech equipment, yet the engineering section of the ship consists of lots of pipes, valves, barrels, and very 20th-century looking panels and boxes. Bad, bad choice. Despite these minor distractions, I would definitely recommend this movie. It is highly entertaining, fast-paced, action-filled, and engaging. Review: Let's Go Space Trekin'! - How do you revive a classic Sci Fi TV series with a devoted, loyal cult following that will crush you if you screw it up? Clearly you hire JJ Abrams to produce and direct. I consider myself somewhat of a Trekie. I've seen every episode of the original TV series...at least 3 times. I've seen each of the major motion pictures...at least twice. I've seen all of the spin off TV series and their respective motion picture spinoffs at minimum once. So, yeah, I'd say I'm a fan. And there are fans that DO NOT want their stuff messed with no matter what. After seeing Abrams' Star Trek, I can't believe that any loyal fan...even the preservationists...could be unhappy. But there are those that will just be impossible to please, evidenced by the fair amount of strong criticism in the review section of this page alone. I, on the other hand, am firmly in the camp of this-was-a-great-movie! Abrams and his cast pay homage to everything that made the original TV series a classic. The movie takes you back through time to some short segments about Kirk's and Spock's childhood, then quickly moves to and progresses from when the two board the Enterprise for their first times. And they are of course joined by the other primary characters from the original TV series. All of the characters attempt to channel a bit of the persona and dispositions of the original actors, and they do a terrific job combining the natures of the original characters with some modern day personality polish. Abrams version of Star Trek might rewrite some of what was solidly in place with years of Star Trek history, and that might indeed be what has a Tribble in the bonnet of some of the preservationists. But Abrams' version has mostly succeeded in revitalizing a series that was inevitable to be remade by someone. So to the preservationists I say, be very very happy that you got such a great movie that is such a tribute to Gene Roddenberry's vision. Star Trek 2009 has a lot action, a great cast, a fine story...I was thoroughly entertained from start to finish. My only problem with this movie is that it was too short. That's right...I said too SHORT. I'm usually complaining about how unnecessarily long Hollywood makes its movies these days. But if you watch the deleted scenes that are included on Disk 2 of the Blu Ray package, you actually learn stuff that would have enhanced the theatrical version of the movie had it not been cut out. One thing that won't be short is the life of the new franchise that Abrams has created. These are the MAIDEN voyages of the Starship Enterprise. Where no man has gone before. Jump on board this initial voyage of what I'm guessing will be many before Abrams is done. ## Technical Specifications | Specification | Value | |---------------|-------| | ASIN | B01N5T9IZM | | Aspect Ratio | Unknown | | Best Sellers Rank | #294,205 in Movies & TV ( See Top 100 in Movies & TV ) #8,679 in Comedy (Movies & TV) | | Customer Reviews | 4.8 4.8 out of 5 stars (29,514) | | Dubbed: | French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish | | Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | No | | Language | English (DTS 5.1), French (Dolby Digital 5.1), Spanish (Dolby Digital 5.1) | | Media Format | 4K | | Number of discs | 2 | | Product Dimensions | 6.69 x 5.31 x 0.47 inches; 3.53 ounces | | Release date | February 20, 2017 | | Run time | 2 hours and 6 minutes | | Studio | Paramount Home Entertainment | | Subtitles: | Danish, Dutch, Finnish, French, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Spanish | ## Product Details - **Color:** Color - **Format:** 4K - **Genre:** Comedy - **Language:** English - **Runtime:** 2 hours and 6 minutes ## Images ![Star Trek (2009) [Blu-ray] [2017] [4K UHD] - Image 1](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81sm4rpZxlL.jpg) ![Star Trek (2009) [Blu-ray] [2017] [4K UHD] - Image 2](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81n8-623MxL.jpg) ## Customer Reviews ### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ A truly entertaining and thoroughly enjoyable movie! *by J***S on July 8, 2013* Every time I watch this movie I am reminded how much I enjoy it. Let me say from the start that I grew up on the original series (TOS), and I am a die-hard "Star Trek" fan. However, since TOS is truly unique and unrepeatable, I don't judge the movie by those standards, as I think to do so is a losing proposition. Why not let this movie stand or fall on its own merits? Why not appreciate it for what it is rather than what some people imagine it should have been? For people familiar with TOS, there are definitely moments that are genuinely Star Trek, such as the interactions between Kirk/Spock and Kirk/McCoy. It was funny, for instance, to hear what they suggested as the origins of McCoy's nickname, Bones. McCoy also has some classic moments when, like his TOS counterpart, his emotions get the better of him. And then there is the scene where Chekov attempts to speak his password to the computer, only to be initially rejected because of his thick Russian accent ("Wictor, Wictor" instead of "Victor, Victor"). These are the kinds of moments that made TOS truly memorable, and it was wonderful to see them in the movie. I think Zachary Quinto does exceedingly well as the young Spock. I found young Kirk's character to be a little more reckless than I think is necessary, but Chris Pine did a fine job portraying him. We learned the first names of several major characters. There is plenty of action, excellent special effects, and a good story line. And, just like TOS, there are some very funny one-liners. I actually would give the movie four and a half stars if I could. Despite the high entertainment value of this movie, there were a few things that proved to be just plain silliness for me. Overall they did not ruin the movie, but they were certainly momentary distractions and warranted a minor deduction in my rating: 1. The whole Spock/Uhura romance is utterly foreign to TOS, so I don't know why it was introduced in this movie. It just seemed pointless to me. 2. The idea of the "red matter" was also problematic. TOS was consistent in making the science of its day very believable. Even though the show was science fiction, many of the concepts contained therein were based on real science. How is it, then, that while one drop of the red matter can create a small black hole, it can be touched with a syringe and stored in a container? 3. Arguably the most absurd aspect of the technology in the movie was the decision to use a brewery for the engineering shots. My goodness, it's the 23rd century. Take a look at the Enterprise's bridge. It's brimming with ultra hi-tech equipment, yet the engineering section of the ship consists of lots of pipes, valves, barrels, and very 20th-century looking panels and boxes. Bad, bad choice. Despite these minor distractions, I would definitely recommend this movie. It is highly entertaining, fast-paced, action-filled, and engaging. ### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Let's Go Space Trekin'! *by S***Y on November 19, 2009* How do you revive a classic Sci Fi TV series with a devoted, loyal cult following that will crush you if you screw it up? Clearly you hire JJ Abrams to produce and direct. I consider myself somewhat of a Trekie. I've seen every episode of the original TV series...at least 3 times. I've seen each of the major motion pictures...at least twice. I've seen all of the spin off TV series and their respective motion picture spinoffs at minimum once. So, yeah, I'd say I'm a fan. And there are fans that DO NOT want their stuff messed with no matter what. After seeing Abrams' Star Trek, I can't believe that any loyal fan...even the preservationists...could be unhappy. But there are those that will just be impossible to please, evidenced by the fair amount of strong criticism in the review section of this page alone. I, on the other hand, am firmly in the camp of this-was-a-great-movie! Abrams and his cast pay homage to everything that made the original TV series a classic. The movie takes you back through time to some short segments about Kirk's and Spock's childhood, then quickly moves to and progresses from when the two board the Enterprise for their first times. And they are of course joined by the other primary characters from the original TV series. All of the characters attempt to channel a bit of the persona and dispositions of the original actors, and they do a terrific job combining the natures of the original characters with some modern day personality polish. Abrams version of Star Trek might rewrite some of what was solidly in place with years of Star Trek history, and that might indeed be what has a Tribble in the bonnet of some of the preservationists. But Abrams' version has mostly succeeded in revitalizing a series that was inevitable to be remade by someone. So to the preservationists I say, be very very happy that you got such a great movie that is such a tribute to Gene Roddenberry's vision. Star Trek 2009 has a lot action, a great cast, a fine story...I was thoroughly entertained from start to finish. My only problem with this movie is that it was too short. That's right...I said too SHORT. I'm usually complaining about how unnecessarily long Hollywood makes its movies these days. But if you watch the deleted scenes that are included on Disk 2 of the Blu Ray package, you actually learn stuff that would have enhanced the theatrical version of the movie had it not been cut out. One thing that won't be short is the life of the new franchise that Abrams has created. These are the MAIDEN voyages of the Starship Enterprise. Where no man has gone before. Jump on board this initial voyage of what I'm guessing will be many before Abrams is done. ### ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Review *by D***H on May 28, 2009* The producers of the new Star Trek movie are asking a lot of us. We have taken the characters of Kirk, Spock, and Bones to our hearts. To see them played by different actors from those we are used to is a very unsettling experience. Wisely, the film stands alone, so younger viewers who haven't seen repeats, video's or the later movies featuring the original actors, will not be worried that they don't speak Klingon and don't know what the Genesis Project is. Director J.J.Abrams has cast a fine group of actors, mostly unknown, except for Simon Pegg in the role of Scotty and an actor from the original series in a cameo (I won't spoil it by telling you who it is!). The actor playing Kirk bears more resemblance to Brad Pitt than to William Shatner, and there is a danger that his arrogance doesn't come with the charm that Shatner always had. The character of Kirk in the original series had one flaw, which was that he was in some ways 'too perfect', and with this in mind, the writers have chosen to emphasise the one part of Kirk's character that can be seen as a weakness, his inability to accept a losing scenario. They have added to this, making Kirk more of a rebel, like a James Dean in space, indeed the first sight we have of this new Kirk is in a bar room brawl just like Paris from Star Trek Voyager. The other actors are given good lines to speak, including a few catchphrases, but as there are seven main crew characters, the minor four are sidelined in favour of Kirk, McCoy, and Spock. Lieutenant Uhura gets more to do in this, and unfortunately she does seem to be more of a token representative of her race and sex than she did back in 1966, as the remainder of the cast seems mainly caucasian and male. Still, Zoe Saldaña makes a good job of the material she's given and is nearly as captivating as the original. Cleverly, the film-makers have set this story in an alternate reality which avoids having to stick slavishly to the original series/movies' continuity, which is probably a good idea if you want to make a good movie rather than a fan novel. It would be a remarkable co-icidence if Abrans were not influenced by the recent re-launch of Doctor Who, as he uses 'Who' actor Simon Pegg, a sword fight on the edge of a space ship, and the destruction of a major character's home planet just like the 2005 Doctor Whos. The action moves quickly, it's jam-packed with action and special effects, and yet there are still a few quiet moments when we can reflect on the most important aspect of Star Trek; its characters. The re-casts of Chekov and Sulu are good actors and enjoyable in their small roles, and all have reportedly been signed up for a further two movies. If Paramount continues to employ Abrams as writer and Director, they should be well worth watching. ## Frequently Bought Together - Star Trek (2009) [Blu-ray] [2017] - Star Trek Into Darkness (Blu-ray) [Region Free] - Star Trek Beyond + Exclusive Bonus Disc - 2 x Blu-ray + Digital Download --- ## Why Shop on Desertcart? - 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016 - 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories - 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price - 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members) - 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection - ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews **Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.kr/products/246080327-star-trek-2009-blu-ray-2017-4k-uhd](https://www.desertcart.kr/products/246080327-star-trek-2009-blu-ray-2017-4k-uhd) --- *Product available on Desertcart South Korea* *Store origin: KR* *Last updated: 2026-06-08*