FANMIS Mens Luxury Watches Rotatable Bezel Sapphire Glass Luminous Quartz Silver Gold Two Tone Stainless Steel Watch

I took a chance on this watch and was not disapppointed. I'm not sure what some reviewers were thinking when they mentioned that the watch is light, clumsy, or cheap. Nothing could be further from the truth. Please see my attached pics. This is a fine piece of time keeper. This watch is something you would pay 10 times for. The material used to make this watch seems to be of high quality and the watch itself seems durable. The first thing I noticed was how it was packaged nicely and it comes in a great looking box. As I opened the box, the first thing that I noticed was how beautiful the green color looks and how elegant the watch is coming out of the box. The size is just right, not too big or small. The weight is that of a fine watch, not light (as some reviewers mentioned) and not too heavy - just right. I went to the local watch repairman to have the band/strap shortened a bit to fit my wrist. The glass seems to be of high quality also (sapphire) and the manufacture claims that it is scratch resistant. The strap or band is made from high quality steel and alloy. The glass above the calendar (date) is slightly embossed, which gives it a unique feature that stands out from other watches. Battery is included in the watch and it functions right out of the box. All and all, the attention to detail this watch has is exceptional. The designer didn't spare any details. You won't be disappointed with this watch...and for a great price on Amazon! This is a must buy if you are in the market for a fine looking and functioning watch. It will be the topic of conversation wherever you go.

Looks like a million bucks. Works fine so far. This watch keeps absolutely perfect time! It arrived showing the correct time to the second checked by my smart phone. Now a few months later it is still exactly on time. Amazing. I will forgive its glass bezel, which was advertised as sapphire. But, let's get real, for the low price to expect sapphire is ridiculous. This is an excellent timekeeper thanks to that Japanese quartz movement. You will be delighted at the very heavy duty high quality stainless steel they built this with. Let me leave you with one caveat, however, the luminous dots on the face of my watch (which I was counting on to be very luminous) are barely visible in the dark even after having subjected it to an led flashlight right on the crystal for 15 minutes! So in this regard it might disappoint but, this problem withstanding, the watch is so good I still say it's well worth the money.

First off, Im a watch junkie. I dont like to buy cheap junk and have some nice high end expensive watches, so I know a thing or two about it. After doing tons of research and reading lots of reviews, I realized this looks a lot more like the Rolex Submariner than other watches from other companies. If your sitting at a bar and the person next to you looks at it, they will probably think / believe that it is a Rolex, the main reason why is the crown insignia on the face. The Invicta has those pilots wings on the face and people with sharp eyes will notice that. Other rolex knock offs are dead giveaways that their not real Rolex's because they dont have that crown under the 12 on the watch, and thats maybe the first thing people will look at. The bezel on this watch is just like the Rolex. Does this watch feel cheap? NO. Does it look expensive? YES. Does it look and feel like quality when your wearing it? YES. For the money you get a really nice watch. The band is nice too. Would I feel comfortable wearing this while hanging out with Donald Trump and his friends or being the guest on a late night talk show flashing it around? You bet!

All things considered, truly a fantastic watch for the price. I don't think I would be as happy if it was $45 or $50, but seeing as I spent $35 on it I couldn't be happier. When compared with my friends Rolex of the same style, they were genuinely indistinguishable aside from the fact that this watch has a slightly larger face than the Rolex. I have only had the watch for 2 full days so I will have to update this review later but as of right now it looks fantastic, has a great weight, and keeps excellent time (much better than the Rolex). A few cons to mention that keep it from 5 stars: the band feels very cheap. the watch face is nice and heavy but the metal two tone band feels extremely light and cheap, almost like plastic. Also, the clasp is pretty cheap. It's doesn't seem terribly sturdy. The glow in the dark feature of the hands also may as well not exist, it fades within less than a minute after a full exposure 5 minute charge. Other than those few cons the watch is truly an excellent watch for the price and I would definitely recommend if you're not wanting to spend more than $35. Great weight, really smart looking face with expensive looking features.

I loved the first watch I bought so much I bought two more in different colors. You can’t beat the value here. Watch is very pretty, has a nice heft to it, and keeps perfect time. Wrist band a bit clunky by the clasp, but looks great. Obviously this is not a divers watch, just looks like one. I don’t get them wet as not waterproof just water resistant. I’ve had a Rolex datejust since 1981, love it. Still looks beautiful. Prices today for them just too high to justify, but they are great investments. Can’t get a authentic Rolex Submariner new today even if you have the means, hard to find. This is a fun watch that looks great.

It has a very pretty face but understand that it is a quartz movement and the minute hand will tick not move smoothly.the band is cheap but you cannot complain for the price if you're just looking for a nice looking watch that's inexpensive it's a decent watch. If you're expecting this to be a Rolex it's not. But for a budget watch it's nice. Built as well as an Invicta but it doesn't cost anywhere near as much.

I just can't get over what a good looking watch this is. It looks exactly like the Rolex Submariner Date, but costs $40 as opposed to $15,000. My Fanmis copy keeps perfect time. I don't wear it swimming, but it's OK for washing hands and such. One side of the band was easy to adjust for length when removing a link, but the other side of the band had links which were very difficult to remove. The watchband clasp could be a little more substantial, but it seems to work fine. I would highly recommend this watch.

As an update, I was at the boat over the weekend and the band broke, and I cannot find the part necessary to fix the band. I have not abused the watch or even put it through much in the way of stress. It spent most of its life laying on my bedside table. As a result, I will not be ordering another one. Below is my original review: I have owned a number of Invicta 8928OBs over about a 20 year period. I wear them every day, and though I primarily buy them so that I look good in business meetings, I basically wear them constantly, even when I'm working in the yard, garage, or on my boat. I usually get 3 years or so out of them before they become scratched and the band starts falling apart to the point where they're not really worth trying to fix. This time, I figured I would buy another one to keep nice for the meetings, and try Fanmis (Reginald) as a beater watch. I will refer to it "Reginald", as that is what it says on the watch face, plastic bag, etc., even though the box says "Fanmis". As to the comments about Invictas not keeping good time I think is primarily because people don't realize that the majority of them are "Automatic", meaning that they are wound by arm movement, and are not battery driven. Thus, if you don't wear them often or wind them manually, they won't keep time. All my Invictas have kept reasonably good time. The Fanmis is a quartz watch, and thus should keep excellent time, but the second hand "clicks" from one second to the next, where the automatic movement is closer to a slow, steady sweep. The quartz movement does not require winding. As a side note, I wanted a quartz movement in an Invicta (they make them in a very similar style), but the adjustable bezel on those watches does not look like the Rolex, which is why I prefer the Reginald over the Invicta quartz version. One other reviewer noted that the second hand on the Reginald doesn't line up exactly with the marks. You can see in the photo that assessment was correct. Again, not a huge deal in my mind for a $40 watch. Out of the box & (mostly) adjusted for my wrist, the Invicta weighs 4.8 ounces, and is slightly thicker than the Reginald, which weighed in at 3.8 ounces. The face on both watches are the same size (40 MM). This weight difference may simply be the automatic movement, though I will say the band (especially the clasp) seems thinner on the Reginald. I too, found the adjustment of the band somewhat annoying on the Reginald, but surprisingly, this time I could not tap our the pins on the band of the Invicta, so I am going to return it for a replacement. Any way about it, the thing to do is to use the tool and a small hammer to tap out the pins. Make sure to pay attention to the direction the pins come out (it is cast into the back of the links on both models). Using the tool and the hammer, and laying the band on thick soft paper (like a newspaper) works well. As you tap out the pin, it will stick further into the newspaper until it sticks out far enough to be removed by a pair of pliers. One person commented about only 3 links being removable. This is true, but was not an issue for me, as once I removed those links and adjusted the pin on the band, I got it to the right size. I am about 5' 9" and 180 lbs, and not particularly big-boned, so for me, it worked just fine. The Invicta comes with more adjustable links, so if you have beefy wrists or relatively thin wrists, you may need to go with the Invicta for the greater adjustability. I also find the fact of the Invicta to be a deeper, richer looking blue, though out of the box and not side-by side, the Reginald looks just fine. The clasp of the Reginald has the gold center pattern continued, where the Invicta's is just stainless. Neither is a deal breaker for me. Also note that the tip of second hand on the Reginald is red. I saw one review that indicated the Reginald does not remain very luminous in the dark. I agree the Invicta does much better in this regard. I also find the crown (knob on side of the watch) does not screw in on the Reginald, causing me to doubt its touted waterproof claims. The Invicta crown threads in nicely, and has always withstood water (I've swam and snorkeled, but not scuba-dove with my Invictas). Overall, I think the Invicta 8928Ob is a better watch if you're willing to live with the self-winding issue of an automatic watch. If you want a quartz watch, then the Reginald may be the way to go if you want the bezel to look authentic Rolex. However, in return for the Reginald/Fanmis being about half the price of the Invicta, I fully expect it won't last as long. For that matter, I had a street-purchased knock-off Rolex once in which the face faded over time, and I wonder if that will happen with the Reginald/Fanmis. It did not happen with the Invicta. So, I plan on keeping the Reginald/Fanmis as my "beater" watch, and try to get in the habit of using the replacement Invicta for work & business meetings so that hopefully the Invicta will look better longer.