NKJV Study Bible, Leathersoft, Brown, Comfort Print

Direct download from kindle caused crashing the kindle. So tried downloading from pc via usb and is working perfectly fine.

Need leather softtouch niv full color study bible .. not like kindle reading ... Please kindly send print copies waiting

I am not able to read this book on my kindle at all. Keeps crashing. Should be fixed immediately. S

I love that this study bible explains scriptures and makes understanding the bible easier. I love this Study Bible. I would highly recommend it.

This is an awesome Bible and it comes just as it is described. It can be a good gift to a loved one.

Beautiful leather bound NKJV Bible. Love it.

There are theological criticisms of the New King James Version (NKJV), though they primarily originate from advocates of the King James Version (KJV)-only movement, who argue that the NKJV compromises the authority and doctrinal purity of the KJV by introducing subtle changes based on modern textual criticism. These critics contend that the NKJV, while marketed as a faithful update to the KJV, actually serves as a "bridge" to more liberal modern translations (e.g., NIV, ESV) by incorporating eclectic textual variants, footnotes that cast doubt on the traditional Received Text (Textus Receptus for the New Testament), and translational choices that allegedly weaken key doctrines like the deity of Christ, salvation by grace, eternal punishment, and biblical inerrancy. Defenders of the NKJV, including many evangelical scholars, counter that it remains a reliable, formal-equivalence translation rooted in the Majority/Byzantine text tradition, with changes aimed at clarity rather than doctrinal alteration.Below, I'll outline the main categories of theological criticisms, with specific examples drawn from critics' analyses. These focus on instances where the NKJV's wording is said to obscure or alter theological emphases compared to the KJV.1. Textual Basis and Omissions/Questioning of Key Passages Critics argue that the NKJV undermines the KJV's textual foundation by relying on the Textus Receptus but including extensive footnotes referencing the critical United Bible Societies (UBS)/Nestle-Aland texts, which omit or question about 44 entire verses and parts of 95 others (e.g., the longer ending of Mark 16 or the woman caught in adultery in John 7:53–8:11). This is seen as sowing doubt about the Bible's completeness and authority.1 John 5:7 (Comma Johanneum): The KJV includes the explicit Trinitarian formula ("For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one"), supporting the doctrine of the Trinity. The NKJV omits it from the main text (following the Majority Text, which lacks it) and relegates it to a footnote as a "textual variant," which critics say weakens Trinitarian clarity and aligns with unitarian or liberal views. 2. Changes Affecting the Deity of Christ and Incarnation Several alterations are accused of downplaying Jesus' divine status or the hypostatic union (Christ's full divinity and humanity).Acts 3:26: KJV: "Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you..." NKJV: "...his Servant Jesus..." Critics claim this demotes Christ from "Son" (emphasizing divine sonship and authority) to "Servant," implying all believers are merely servants, thus diluting the unique obedience owed to Him as God. Matthew 20:20: KJV: "Then came to him the mother of Zebedee's children with her sons, worshipping him..." NKJV: "...kneeling down before him..." The Greek proskuneō (used elsewhere in the KJV for divine worship, e.g., Matthew 2:11) is rendered as "worshipping" in the KJV but softened to "kneeling" in the NKJV, allegedly obscuring evidence of Christ's deity. Hebrews 2:16: KJV: "For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham." NKJV: "For indeed he does not give aid to angels, but he does give aid to the seed of Abraham." This shifts from Christ's incarnation ("took on him") to mere assistance, weakening the doctrine of the hypostatic union. 3. Changes Affecting Soteriology (Doctrine of Salvation)Matthew 7:14: KJV: "Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life..." NKJV: "Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life..." Critics argue this introduces "difficulty" into the path to salvation, contradicting grace-alone (Ephesians 2:8–9) and promoting a works-based or "Lordship salvation" view where entering heaven requires human effort. Matthew 5:32: KJV: "But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery..." NKJV: "...except for the cause of sexual immorality..." The shift from "fornication" (Greek porneia, often tied to premarital or incestuous sin) to the broader "sexual immorality" is said to loosen biblical restrictions on divorce and remarriage, allowing adultery as grounds and undermining marital permanence as a reflection of covenant theology. 4. Changes Affecting Eschatology and Eternal PunishmentIsaiah 66:5: KJV: "...the Lord will appear to your joy..." NKJV: "...that we may see your joy..." This removes the reference to the Lord's (Christ's) visible return, allegedly obscuring the Second Coming. Hell/Hades Rendering: The NKJV transliterates Greek hadēs and Hebrew shə’ôl as "Hades" or "Sheol" in over 60 verses (e.g., Revelation 1:18; Matthew 5:22; Acts 2:27) instead of translating them as "hell" like the KJV. Critics, including those influenced by annihilationist views, say this softens the doctrine of eternal conscious torment, making hell seem less severe. 5. Other Doctrinal and Ethical ShiftsTitus 3:10: KJV: "A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject." NKJV: "a divisive man after the first and second admonition, reject." Changing "heretick" to "divisive man" is seen as diluting the call to reject false teachers, weakening ecclesiastical discipline and doctrinal purity. 1 Thessalonians 5:22: KJV: "Abstain from all appearance of evil." NKJV: "Abstain from every form of evil." This removes the caution against even the "appearance" of evil, potentially lowering ethical standards in Christian conduct. Pronoun Distinctions: The NKJV eliminates the KJV's thee/thou (singular, intimate) vs. ye/you (plural) distinctions, e.g., in John 3:7 ("Marvel not that I said unto thee [Nicodemus], Ye [plural] must be born again"). This obscures whether God addresses individuals or groups, affecting personal application of promises or commands. Exodus 16:28: KJV: "How long refuse ye to keep my commandments...?" (addressing the people collectively via Moses). NKJV: "How long do you refuse to keep My commandments...?" (shifting to plural "you," implying Moses shares blame), which critics say distorts accountability for rebellion. Overall, these criticisms portray the NKJV as subtly eroding the KJV's doctrinal precision through over 100,000 word changes (averaging 80 per page), deletions of terms like "Lord" (66 times), "God" (51 times), and "soul" (137 times), and an eclectic approach that prioritizes modern scholarship over preservation. However, such views are not universal; organizations like The Gospel Coalition praise the NKJV as a "worthy heir" to the KJV for its readability and fidelity. For deeper study, consulting both KJV-only resources (e.g., Way of Life Literature) and broader evangelical reviews is recommended.

Ever since I downloaded this, my kindle keeps crashing. This review is NOT a reflection of the actual content. Just that I am unable to read through. May need to delete and sync it again